BHAIKHABHAI MANGALBHAI ZALA MAKVANA(Legal Heir) vs RAVJIBHAI SHANABHAI CHAHUN — 51/2016
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 038. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH040018922016
Filing Number
51/2016
Filing Date
03-10-2016
Registration No
51/2016
Registration Date
05-10-2016
Court
TALUKA COURT, MATAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHAIKHABHAI MANGALBHAI ZALA MAKVANA(Legal Heir)
Adv. U R PRAJAPATI
Respondent(s)
RAVJIBHAI SHANABHAI CHAHUN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 02-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 11-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 27-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case RCS/51/2016 The court partially allowed the plaintiff's suit regarding possession and use of village property (Gram Panchayat Milkat No. 2) in Vansar, Matar district. The plaintiff proved ownership and current possession of the property measuring 9×56 feet but failed to conclusively establish the alleged 5×10 feet encroachment by the defendant. Accordingly, the court decreed that defendants cannot encroach on the plaintiff's property while dismissing the encroachment claim; both parties bear their own litigation costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case RCS/51/2016 The court partially allowed the plaintiff's suit regarding possession and use of village property (Gram Panchayat Milkat No. 2) in Vansar, Matar district. The plaintiff proved ownership and current possession of the property measuring 9×56 feet but failed to conclusively establish the alleged 5×10 feet encroachment by the defendant. Accordingly, the court decreed that defendants cannot encroach on the plaintiff's property while dismissing the encroachment claim; both parties bear their own litigation costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts