Government of Gujarat vs KHODABHAI FULABHAI PARMAR Advocate - P V SOLANKI — 1256/2025

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,98(2),116(B). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH040015772025

Filing Number

1256/2025

Filing Date

17-Dec-2025

Registration No

1256/2025

Registration Date

17-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, MATAR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 16-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA,98(2),116(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KHODABHAI FULABHAI PARMAR Advocate - P V SOLANKI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary The Gujarat High Court convicted the accused Khodabhai (Bharatbhai) Fulabhai Parmar under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for an educational offense, sentencing him to imprisonment until trial completion plus a fine of Rs. 100, with alternative imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid. The court, considering the accused's economic hardship as the sole earning member of his family and the potential impact on his dependents, exercised discretion to impose a lighter sentence than the maximum prescribed, while upholding the conviction based on established principles from precedent case law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 17-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1256/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Gujarat High Court convicted the accused Khodabhai (Bharatbhai) Fulabhai Parmar under the Gujarat Prohibition Act for an educational offense, sentencing him to imprisonment until trial completion plus a fine of Rs. 100, with alternative imprisonment of 2 days if the fine remains unpaid. The court, considering the accused's economic hardship as the sole earning member of his family and the potential impact on his dependents, exercised discretion to impose a lighter sentence than the maximum prescribed, while upholding the conviction based on established principles from precedent case law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case