Government of Gujarat vs TENKAR JENO REGI NO GJ 01 MT 5051 NA CHALAK ANTIM HINDUJI BHATIYA Advocate - S M CHAVAN — 1255/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125(1),324(5). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH040015762025
Filing Number
1255/2025
Filing Date
17-12-2025
Registration No
1255/2025
Registration Date
17-12-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MATAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204033250193
Police Station
LIMBASI POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
TENKAR JENO REGI NO GJ 01 MT 5051 NA CHALAK ANTIM HINDUJI BHATIYA Advocate - S M CHAVAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 26-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 19-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 28-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC NO. 1255-2025 Court Decision: The accused, Antim Hinduj Bhatiya (tanker driver), was acquitted of all charges due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Facts: The case involved a tanker (GJ-01-MT-5051) carrying ethanol that allegedly overturned on November 21, 2025, near Baroda, causing injury to the driver and loss of approximately ₹9.6 lakh worth of ethanol. The accused was charged under IPC sections 281, 125(a), 324(p) and MV Act sections 177, 184 for rash/negligent driving causing damage. Reasoning: Although witnesses testified that the accident occurred and caused losses, they admitted under cross-examination that they did not personally witness the accident. The prosecution could not credibly establish that the driver was driving recklessly or negligently. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the essential elements of the charges beyond reasonable doubt, and the accused was accordingly discharged under BNS section 351. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC NO. 1255-2025 Court Decision: The accused, Antim Hinduj Bhatiya (tanker driver), was acquitted of all charges due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Facts: The case involved a tanker (GJ-01-MT-5051) carrying ethanol that allegedly overturned on November 21, 2025, near Baroda, causing injury to the driver and loss of approximately ₹9.6 lakh worth of ethanol. The accused was charged under IPC sections 281, 125(a), 324(p) and MV Act sections 177, 184 for rash/negligent driving causing damage. Reasoning: Although witnesses testified that the accident occurred and caused losses, they admitted under cross-examination that they did not personally witness the accident. The prosecution could not credibly establish that the driver was driving recklessly or negligently. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the essential elements of the charges beyond reasonable doubt, and the accused was accordingly discharged under BNS section 351. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts