Government of Gujarat vs TENKAR JENO REGI NO GJ 01 MT 5051 NA CHALAK ANTIM HINDUJI BHATIYA Advocate - S M CHAVAN — 1255/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125(1),324(5). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH040015762025

Filing Number

1255/2025

Filing Date

17-Dec-2025

Registration No

1255/2025

Registration Date

17-Dec-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, MATAR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204033250193

Police Station

LIMBASI POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125(1),324(5)
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TENKAR JENO REGI NO GJ 01 MT 5051 NA CHALAK ANTIM HINDUJI BHATIYA Advocate - S M CHAVAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: CC NO. 1255-2025 Court Decision: The accused, Antim Hinduj Bhatiya (tanker driver), was acquitted of all charges due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Facts: The case involved a tanker (GJ-01-MT-5051) carrying ethanol that allegedly overturned on November 21, 2025, near Baroda, causing injury to the driver and loss of approximately ₹9.6 lakh worth of ethanol. The accused was charged under IPC sections 281, 125(a), 324(p) and MV Act sections 177, 184 for rash/negligent driving causing damage. Reasoning: Although witnesses testified that the accident occurred and caused losses, they admitted under cross-examination that they did not personally witness the accident. The prosecution could not credibly establish that the driver was driving recklessly or negligently. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the essential elements of the charges beyond reasonable doubt, and the accused was accordingly discharged under BNS section 351. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 17-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 17-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1255/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC NO. 1255-2025 Court Decision: The accused, Antim Hinduj Bhatiya (tanker driver), was acquitted of all charges due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish the case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Facts: The case involved a tanker (GJ-01-MT-5051) carrying ethanol that allegedly overturned on November 21, 2025, near Baroda, causing injury to the driver and loss of approximately ₹9.6 lakh worth of ethanol. The accused was charged under IPC sections 281, 125(a), 324(p) and MV Act sections 177, 184 for rash/negligent driving causing damage. Reasoning: Although witnesses testified that the accident occurred and caused losses, they admitted under cross-examination that they did not personally witness the accident. The prosecution could not credibly establish that the driver was driving recklessly or negligently. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the essential elements of the charges beyond reasonable doubt, and the accused was accordingly discharged under BNS section 351. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case