STATE BANK OF INDIA - MATAR vs UDESINGBHAI RAMABHAI CHAUHAN — 16/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 18th April 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJKH040013412025
Filing Number
16/2025
Filing Date
15-Nov-2025
Registration No
16/2025
Registration Date
15-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MATAR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE BANK OF INDIA - MATAR
Adv. M R SONI
Respondent(s)
-
1.UDESINGBHAI RAMABHAI CHAUHAN
-
2.DHANJIBHAI RAMABHAI CHAUHAN
-
3.SHANTABEN GOTABHAI CHAUHAN NI VIDHVA
-
4.VINUBHAI GOTABHAI CHAUHAN
-
5.RAMESHBHAI GOTABHAI CHAUHAN
-
6.BHARATBHAI GOTABHAI CHAUHAN
-
7.LAXMIBEN RAMABHAI CHAUHAN NI DIKRI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court directed State Bank of India (Matar) to withdraw its regular decree suit petition filed under Order 11 against the respondents, as the bank had already recovered the outstanding loan amount from the defendants. The court passed this order on April 18, 2025, finding that continuation of the suit was unnecessary after the debt recovery was completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Apr-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Feb-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Dec-2025
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Nov-2025
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 16/2025
The court directed State Bank of India (Matar) to withdraw its regular decree suit petition filed under Order 11 against the respondents, as the bank had already recovered the outstanding loan amount from the defendants. The court passed this order on April 18, 2025, finding that continuation of the suit was unnecessary after the debt recovery was completed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts