STATE BANK OF INDIA - MATAR vs KANUBHAI BHAVANBHAI BHARWAD — 13/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 18th April 2026.
EXE R - EXECUTION PETITION - REGULAR
CNR: GJKH040013382025
Filing Number
13/2025
Filing Date
15-Nov-2025
Registration No
13/2025
Registration Date
15-Nov-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MATAR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
18-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE BANK OF INDIA - MATAR
Adv. M R SONI
Respondent(s)
-
1.KANUBHAI BHAVANBHAI BHARWAD
-
2.MANUBHAI BHAVANBHAI BHARWAD
-
3.RAJESHBHAI BHAVANBHAI BHARWAD
-
4.UPESHBHAI BHAWANBHAI BHARWAD
-
5.RATUBEN BHAWANBHAI BHARWAD NI VIDHVA
-
6.BALVANTBHAI BHAWANBHAI BHARWAD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
18-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed State Bank of India's appeal against the respondents (Kanubhai, Manubhai, and Rajeshbhai Bharwad), finding that the regular suit could not proceed under Section 10 of the CPC as the defendants raised valid objections regarding jurisdiction and maintainability. The court directed that fees be paid to the regular court for proper adjudication of the matter, dated April 18, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Apr-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Feb-2026
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Dec-2025
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Nov-2025
Show-Cause Notice To Judgement Debtor
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 13/2025
The court dismissed State Bank of India's appeal against the respondents (Kanubhai, Manubhai, and Rajeshbhai Bharwad), finding that the regular suit could not proceed under Section 10 of the CPC as the defendants raised valid objections regarding jurisdiction and maintainability. The court directed that fees be paid to the regular court for proper adjudication of the matter, dated April 18, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts