Government of Gujarat vs NATUBHAI RAMANBHAI CHAUHAN Advocate - K I BRAHMBHATT — 661/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,427. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 24th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH040008712022
Filing Number
661/2022
Filing Date
19-Nov-2022
Registration No
661/2022
Registration Date
19-Nov-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, MATAR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204040220078
Police Station
MATAR POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.NATUBHAI RAMANBHAI CHAUHAN Advocate - K I BRAHMBHATT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: CC No. 661/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused, Natubhai Ramanbhai Chauhan, of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 338 and Motor Vehicles Act sections 177, 184 due to lack of reliable evidence. Key Reasoning: While the prosecution established that a traffic accident occurred resulting in injuries to multiple persons, they failed to conclusively prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused's vehicle and reckless driving caused the incident. Despite witness testimony from the injured parties, inconsistencies emerged during cross-examination, and critical evidence—such as the vehicle's registration number and photographic proof—was not reliably presented. The court found insufficient evidence linking the accused's alleged negligent driving to the accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Dec-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Oct-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Aug-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Jul-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Jun-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Mar-2023
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Jan-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 661/2022
Case Summary: CC No. 661/2022 Court Decision: The court acquitted the accused, Natubhai Ramanbhai Chauhan, of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 338 and Motor Vehicles Act sections 177, 184 due to lack of reliable evidence. Key Reasoning: While the prosecution established that a traffic accident occurred resulting in injuries to multiple persons, they failed to conclusively prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused's vehicle and reckless driving caused the incident. Despite witness testimony from the injured parties, inconsistencies emerged during cross-examination, and critical evidence—such as the vehicle's registration number and photographic proof—was not reliably presented. The court found insufficient evidence linking the accused's alleged negligent driving to the accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts