Government of Gujarat vs AFTAFALAM S/O MINAJ AKRUDIN SIDIKI Advocate - M A PATHAN — 482/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH040008342024

Filing Number

482/2024

Filing Date

29-Aug-2024

Registration No

482/2024

Registration Date

29-Aug-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, MATAR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204040240134

Police Station

MATAR POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A)
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AFTAFALAM S/O MINAJ AKRUDIN SIDIKI Advocate - M A PATHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: 482/2024 Court Decision: The accused Aftaf Aalam was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 279, 304(a), and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184 due to insufficient reliable evidence. Key Reasoning: Although the complainant's witnesses testified about a fatal road accident involving a motorcycle, none witnessed the incident firsthand. Critically, no witness could identify the vehicle number or driver involved, making it impossible to establish the accused's involvement beyond reasonable doubt. The court found the prosecution failed to prove essential elements of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 15-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 17-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 13-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 25-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 01-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 17-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 16-May-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 23-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 25-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 18-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 10-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 21-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 21-Oct-2024

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 30-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 29-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 29-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 482/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 482/2024 Court Decision: The accused Aftaf Aalam was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 279, 304(a), and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184 due to insufficient reliable evidence. Key Reasoning: Although the complainant's witnesses testified about a fatal road accident involving a motorcycle, none witnessed the incident firsthand. Critically, no witness could identify the vehicle number or driver involved, making it impossible to establish the accused's involvement beyond reasonable doubt. The court found the prosecution failed to prove essential elements of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case