Government of Gujarat vs AFTAFALAM S/O MINAJ AKRUDIN SIDIKI Advocate - M A PATHAN — 482/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 16th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH040008342024
Filing Number
482/2024
Filing Date
29-08-2024
Registration No
482/2024
Registration Date
29-08-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MATAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204040240134
Police Station
MATAR POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
AFTAFALAM S/O MINAJ AKRUDIN SIDIKI Advocate - M A PATHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 03-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 15-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 17-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 27-11-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 482/2024 Court Decision: The accused Aftaf Aalam was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 279, 304(a), and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184 due to insufficient reliable evidence. Key Reasoning: Although the complainant's witnesses testified about a fatal road accident involving a motorcycle, none witnessed the incident firsthand. Critically, no witness could identify the vehicle number or driver involved, making it impossible to establish the accused's involvement beyond reasonable doubt. The court found the prosecution failed to prove essential elements of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 482/2024 Court Decision: The accused Aftaf Aalam was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 279, 304(a), and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184 due to insufficient reliable evidence. Key Reasoning: Although the complainant's witnesses testified about a fatal road accident involving a motorcycle, none witnessed the incident firsthand. Critically, no witness could identify the vehicle number or driver involved, making it impossible to establish the accused's involvement beyond reasonable doubt. The court found the prosecution failed to prove essential elements of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts