MAHMADSALIM FATEKHAN PATHAN vs IMRANKHAN MAHREABKHAN PATHAN AND OTHERS Advocate - A A BRAHMBHATT — 60/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 4,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH040006362021
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
60/2021
Filing Date
12-11-2021
Registration No
60/2021
Registration Date
12-11-2021
Court
TALUKA COURT, MATAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAHMADSALIM FATEKHAN PATHAN
Adv. D D PAREKH
Respondent(s)
IMRANKHAN MAHREABKHAN PATHAN AND OTHERS Advocate - A A BRAHMBHATT
MUNAVARKHAN MAHERABKHAN PATHAN
NURBIBI DILBASHKHAN PATHAN
MUMTAJBIBI DILBASHKHAN PATHAN
SATARKHA DILBASHKHAN PATHAN
NAJIRAKHA DILABASAHKHAN PATHAN
SUBEKHA DILABASHKHAN PATHAN
MARIYAMBIBI DILBASHKHAN PATHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 20-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 26-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 25-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 14-10-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary The Principal Civil Judge, Matar granted a temporary injunction petition in favor of the plaintiff in a money recovery and property sale dispute. The court found a prima facie case established, as the plaintiff paid Rs. 17,00,000 toward a property purchase but the defendant failed to execute the sale deed or return funds, with a dishonored cheque as supporting evidence. Defendants were directed to not alienate the suit property pending further court orders, and both parties bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Principal Civil Judge, Matar granted a temporary injunction petition in favor of the plaintiff in a money recovery and property sale dispute. The court found a prima facie case established, as the plaintiff paid Rs. 17,00,000 toward a property purchase but the defendant failed to execute the sale deed or return funds, with a dishonored cheque as supporting evidence. Defendants were directed to not alienate the suit property pending further court orders, and both parties bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts