Government of Gujarat vs CHETAN URFE VIPUL VINUJI THAKOR Advocate - P V SOLANKI — 448/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 316(2),318(4),61(2),54,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH040005472025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

448/2025

Filing Date

28-03-2025

Registration No

448/2025

Registration Date

28-03-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, MATAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

10th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204033240184

Police Station

LIMBASI POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 316(2),318(4),61(2),54,

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

CHETAN URFE VIPUL VINUJI THAKOR Advocate - P V SOLANKI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

10-04-2026

Disposed

07-04-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

23-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

09-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

16-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

10-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Chetan Urfe Vipul Vinuji Thakor, of charges under IPC Sections 316(2), 318(4), 61(2), and 54 (criminal breach of trust, cheating, and criminal conspiracy) due to lack of reliable evidence, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that while the defendant was arrested on allegations of extorting ₹2 lakh initially and promising to return ₹6 lakh later but never returning the money, the complainant and defense witnesses testified that an out-of-court settlement had been reached, contradicting the prosecution's narrative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused, Chetan Urfe Vipul Vinuji Thakor, of charges under IPC Sections 316(2), 318(4), 61(2), and 54 (criminal breach of trust, cheating, and criminal conspiracy) due to lack of reliable evidence, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that while the defendant was arrested on allegations of extorting ₹2 lakh initially and promising to return ₹6 lakh later but never returning the money, the complainant and defense witnesses testified that an out-of-court settlement had been reached, contradicting the prosecution's narrative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MATAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case