Government of Gujarat vs ARVINDBHAI MANGALBHAI CHAUHAN Advocate - M A PATHAN — 197/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 325,504,506(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 28th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH040002942024
Filing Number
197/2024
Filing Date
19-Mar-2024
Registration No
197/2024
Registration Date
19-Mar-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, MATAR
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
28-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204040230339
Police Station
MATAR POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.ARVINDBHAI MANGALBHAI CHAUHAN Advocate - M A PATHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: CC No. 197/2024 Court Decision: The accused, Arvindbhai Mangalbhai Chauhan, was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 325, 504, 506(2), and GP Act Section 135 due to insufficient credible evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court found that witness testimonies did not establish the alleged assault or threats. Evidence lacked corroboration regarding specific threats made or injuries caused, and the court noted deficiencies in the police investigation supporting the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Apr-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
01-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-May-2025
Warrant Of Arrest
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Apr-2025
Warrant Of Arrest
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Feb-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-May-2024
Process To Accused
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Mar-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Mar-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 197/2024
Case Summary: CC No. 197/2024 Court Decision: The accused, Arvindbhai Mangalbhai Chauhan, was acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 325, 504, 506(2), and GP Act Section 135 due to insufficient credible evidence. The prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court found that witness testimonies did not establish the alleged assault or threats. Evidence lacked corroboration regarding specific threats made or injuries caused, and the court noted deficiencies in the police investigation supporting the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts