Government of Gujarat vs SHARDABEN W/O POPATBHAI SHANBHAI VAGHRI — 174/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH040002242026

Filing Number

174/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

174/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MATAR

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHARDABEN W/O POPATBHAI SHANBHAI VAGHRI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the respondent (Shardaben) under Section 65(A)(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act after she voluntarily pleaded guilty to the charge. Considering her circumstances—being the sole breadwinner of her family, first-time offender, and economic hardship—the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment till the rising of court and a fine of ₹100 (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default), rather than the statutorily prescribed punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 174/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the respondent (Shardaben) under Section 65(A)(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act after she voluntarily pleaded guilty to the charge. Considering her circumstances—being the sole breadwinner of her family, first-time offender, and economic hardship—the court imposed a lenient sentence of imprisonment till the rising of court and a fine of ₹100 (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default), rather than the statutorily prescribed punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case