Government of Gujarat vs CHANCHALBEN URFF CHANDABEN W/O PUNAMBHAI LAKHABHAI — 173/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH040002232026

Case disposed

Filing Number

173/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

173/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MATAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

CHANCHALBEN URFF CHANDABEN W/O PUNAMBHAI LAKHABHAI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The Matar Judicial Magistrate First Class convicted the respondent Chanchalben under Section 65(A)(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act after she voluntarily pleaded guilty to the offense. Considering the respondent's status as the sole breadwinner of her poor family, her first criminal offense, lack of legal knowledge, and hardship in attending court proceedings regularly, the court imposed a lenient sentence of time already served in custody and a fine of Rs. 100 (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default), rather than the maximum punishment prescribed by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Matar Judicial Magistrate First Class convicted the respondent Chanchalben under Section 65(A)(A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act after she voluntarily pleaded guilty to the offense. Considering the respondent's status as the sole breadwinner of her poor family, her first criminal offense, lack of legal knowledge, and hardship in attending court proceedings regularly, the court imposed a lenient sentence of time already served in custody and a fine of Rs. 100 (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default), rather than the maximum punishment prescribed by law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MATAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case