Government of Gujarat vs DILIPBHAI SHANKARBHAI TALPADA — 172/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH040002222026

Case disposed

Filing Number

172/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

172/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MATAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 185
GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

DILIPBHAI SHANKARBHAI TALPADA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case 172/2026 Summary The court convicted the accused Dilipbhai Shankarbhai Talpada under Prohibition Act Section 66(1) and Motor Vehicles Act Section 185 for offenses related to alcohol prohibition and drunk driving. The accused pleaded guilty to the charges. The court sentenced him to imprisonment till the court rises, and imposed a combined fine of Rs. 3,100 (Rs. 100 under Prohibition Act and Rs. 3,000 under MV Act), with 2 days simple imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remains unpaid. The vehicle in question was ordered to be returned to the applicant upon verification of ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 172/2026 Summary The court convicted the accused Dilipbhai Shankarbhai Talpada under Prohibition Act Section 66(1) and Motor Vehicles Act Section 185 for offenses related to alcohol prohibition and drunk driving. The accused pleaded guilty to the charges. The court sentenced him to imprisonment till the court rises, and imposed a combined fine of Rs. 3,100 (Rs. 100 under Prohibition Act and Rs. 3,000 under MV Act), with 2 days simple imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remains unpaid. The vehicle in question was ordered to be returned to the applicant upon verification of ownership. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MATAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case