Government of Gujarat vs AMRUTBHAI@AMO BABUBHAI PARMAR Advocate - B G PARMAR — 141/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 25th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH040002082023

Case disposed

Filing Number

141/2023

Filing Date

18-03-2023

Registration No

141/2023

Registration Date

18-03-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, MATAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204033230008

Police Station

LIMBASI POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

AMRUTBHAI@AMO BABUBHAI PARMAR Advocate - B G PARMAR

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

25-03-2026

Disposed

24-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

16-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

11-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

17-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court acquitted the accused, Amrutbhai (Amo Babubhai Parmar), of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 338 and Motor Vehicles Act sections 177, 184 due to insufficient credible evidence. The complainant failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused negligently drove the luxury bus causing an accident that injured the victim; key details like the bus driver's identity and specific circumstances remained unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted the accused, Amrutbhai (Amo Babubhai Parmar), of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 338 and Motor Vehicles Act sections 177, 184 due to insufficient credible evidence. The complainant failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused negligently drove the luxury bus causing an accident that injured the victim; key details like the bus driver's identity and specific circumstances remained unproven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MATAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case