KASHIRAM ANUBHAI BHARWAD vs HATHIBHAI KISHABHAI PARMAR Advocate - D H BAROT — 62/2012
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 020,038. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 23rd March 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH040000682012
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
62/2012
Filing Date
14-12-2012
Registration No
62/2012
Registration Date
14-12-2012
Court
TALUKA COURT, MATAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KASHIRAM ANUBHAI BHARWAD
Adv. S M PATHAN
Respondent(s)
HATHIBHAI KISHABHAI PARMAR Advocate - D H BAROT
UDESANG KISHBHAI PARMAR
LALJIBHAI KISHABHAI PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 26-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 19-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 17-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected the plaintiff's suit for specific performance and permanent injunction regarding agricultural land, finding the 1990 agreement to sell invalid under Section 43 of the Tenancy Act (1948) since the property was restricted tenure land requiring Collector's sanction that was never obtained. The court also found the suit barred by limitation (22-year delay) and held that the plaintiff failed to prove the seller had authority to transfer the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The court rejected the plaintiff's suit for specific performance and permanent injunction regarding agricultural land, finding the 1990 agreement to sell invalid under Section 43 of the Tenancy Act (1948) since the property was restricted tenure land requiring Collector's sanction that was never obtained. The court also found the suit barred by limitation (22-year delay) and held that the plaintiff failed to prove the seller had authority to transfer the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts