SBURBHAI JAVARABHAI PARAMAR vs LATE AATAMARAM AVACHALBHAI PARAMR Advocate - F F PATHAN1. — 24/2009
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 034,038. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 19th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH040000292009
Next Hearing
19th June 2026
Filing Number
24/2009
Filing Date
06-06-2009
Registration No
24/2009
Registration Date
06-06-2009
Court
TALUKA COURT, MATAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SBURBHAI JAVARABHAI PARAMAR
Adv. B A PATEL
Respondent(s)
LATE AATAMARAM AVACHALBHAI PARAMR Advocate - F F PATHAN1.
BHIKHABHAI AATAMARAM PARAMAR 1.
VINUBHAI AATAMARAM PARAMAR 1.
SURESHBHAI AATAMARAM PARAMAR
LATE JALAMBHAI AVACHALBAHI PARMAR 2.
JIBABEN JALAMBHAI PARMAR 2.
PUNAMBHAI JALAMBHAI PARMARR
CHANCHLBEN DHOBABHAI PARAMR
RAVAJIBHAI PARSOTAMBHAI PARAMR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-06-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 26-05-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 08-05-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 21-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 30-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS/24/2009 Outcome: The petition is partially allowed. The court granted the petitioner (Sburabhai Javarabhai Paramar) relief regarding certain disputed land parcels in Block 58, ordering that he receives ownership of specified survey numbers (26/2 and 26/3) of the contested property. However, regarding survey number 26/1, which is in the respondent's name, no relief was granted as the petitioner lacks standing to claim it. The court directed that case costs follow the final decision on the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS/24/2009 Outcome: The petition is partially allowed. The court granted the petitioner (Sburabhai Javarabhai Paramar) relief regarding certain disputed land parcels in Block 58, ordering that he receives ownership of specified survey numbers (26/2 and 26/3) of the contested property. However, regarding survey number 26/1, which is in the respondent's name, no relief was granted as the petitioner lacks standing to claim it. The court directed that case costs follow the final decision on the main suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts