RAMABHAI MATAMBHAI BHARAVAD vs KANUBHAI NATAHABHAI PATEL Advocate - M J BHATT — 112/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 22,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH030044222022
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
112/2022
Filing Date
14-11-2022
Registration No
112/2022
Registration Date
14-11-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, MEHMEDABAD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMABHAI MATAMBHAI BHARAVAD
Adv. K R PATEL
MADHUBEN JYANTIBHAI BHARAVAD
Adv. K R PATEL
DIPENBHAI JAYNTIBHAI BAHRAVAD
Adv. K R PATEL
NARENDRABHAI RAMABHAI BAHRAVAD
Adv. K R PATEL
HEMENEDRABHAI RAMBHAI BHARAVAD
Adv. K R PATEL
JYANTIBHAI MATAMABHAI BHARVAD
Adv. K R PATEL
GOVINDDBHAI MATAMBAHAI BHARVAD
Adv. K R PATEL
Respondent(s)
KANUBHAI NATAHABHAI PATEL Advocate - M J BHATT
MADHUBEN KANUBHAI PATEL
Adv. M J BHATT
UTAPALBHAI KANUBHAI PATEL
Adv. M J BHATT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 23-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 19-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 14-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 04-10-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed the plaintiff's petition and granted the right to use a disputed access road through the defendant's property to reach the plaintiff's agricultural land until final resolution of the case. The court rejected the defendant's alternative route proposal as lacking sufficient documentary evidence and found the agreed-upon road arrangement valid based on the settlement deed dated 2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed the plaintiff's petition and granted the right to use a disputed access road through the defendant's property to reach the plaintiff's agricultural land until final resolution of the case. The court rejected the defendant's alternative route proposal as lacking sufficient documentary evidence and found the agreed-upon road arrangement valid based on the settlement deed dated 2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts