BHARATSINH SHAKARABHAI CHAUHAN vs SAROJBEN SURESHKUMAR PARMAR Advocate - P J SHARMA — 3759/2022

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 21st May 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH030043392022

Case disposed

Filing Number

3759/2022

Filing Date

10-10-2022

Registration No

3759/2022

Registration Date

10-10-2022

Court

TALUKA COURT, MEHMEDABAD

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

21st May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

BHARATSINH SHAKARABHAI CHAUHAN

Adv. P B VARSOLIYA

Respondent(s)

SAROJBEN SURESHKUMAR PARMAR Advocate - P J SHARMA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

21-05-2026

Disposed

14-05-2026

JUDGEMENT

29-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF DEFENCE

18-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

12-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

21-05-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary: 3759/2022 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mehmedabad, convicted defendant Sarojben Sureshkumar Parmar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (cheque dishonour case). The court found that the complainant Bharatsinh Shakarabhai Chauhan proved he provided Rs. 12,00,000 to the accused via two cheques (nos. 6540048 and 6540047), which were returned due to insufficient funds. Despite receiving a legal notice, the accused failed to repay within the stipulated period. The court sentenced the accused to 12 months simple imprisonment and ordered compensation of Rs. 9,80,000 to the complainant within 30 days, with an additional 3 months imprisonment if payment is not made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 3759/2022 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mehmedabad, convicted defendant Sarojben Sureshkumar Parmar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (cheque dishonour case). The court found that the complainant Bharatsinh Shakarabhai Chauhan proved he provided Rs. 12,00,000 to the accused via two cheques (nos. 6540048 and 6540047), which were returned due to insufficient funds. Despite receiving a legal notice, the accused failed to repay within the stipulated period. The court sentenced the accused to 12 months simple imprisonment and ordered compensation of Rs. 9,80,000 to the complainant within 30 days, with an additional 3 months imprisonment if payment is not made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, MEHMEDABAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case