BHARATSINH SHAKARABHAI CHAUHAN vs SAROJBEN SURESHKUMAR PARMAR Advocate - P J SHARMA — 3759/2022

JudegementView PDF

Case Summary: 3759/2022 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mehmedabad, convicted defendant Sarojben Sureshkumar Parmar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (cheque dishonour case). The court found that the complainant Bharatsinh Shakarabhai Chauhan proved he provided Rs. 12,00,000 to the accused via two cheques (nos. 6540048 and 6540047), which were returned due to insufficient funds. Despite receiving a legal notice, the accused failed to repay within the stipulated period. The court sentenced the accused to 12 months simple imprisonment and ordered compensation of Rs. 9,80,000 to the complainant within 30 days, with an additional 3 months imprisonment if payment is not made. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Disposed

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Judgement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Defence

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Further Statement

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Evidence Of Prosecution

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Process To Accused

Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled

Case filed

Registration No. 3759/2022