GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs Rajamansingh S O Nandlalsingh Rajput Advocate - D M ZALA — 1367/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 316(3),54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 22nd May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH030018022025
e-Filing Number
20-06-2025
Filing Number
1367/2025
Filing Date
03-11-2025
Registration No
1367/2025
Registration Date
03-11-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, MEHMEDABAD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
22nd May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
312
Police Station
MAHEMDAVAD POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT
Respondent(s)
Rajamansingh S O Nandlalsingh Rajput Advocate - D M ZALA
ALPESHKUMAR MANUBHAI CHUAHAN
Adv. D M ZALA
RAYAJIBHAI CHHOTABHAI DABHI
Adv. D M ZALA
SATISHKUMAR RAMPALSINH BHAGEL
Adv. D M ZALA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-05-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 11-05-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 16-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 20-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 1367/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused (Rajamansingh S O Nandlalsingh Rajput and three others) of charges under IPC Section 316(3) and 406 related to diesel theft worth ₹1,800 from a tanker on 31/03/2025. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's own witness testimony and cross-examination revealed insufficient evidence of conspiracy to commit the alleged breach of trust and theft. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1367/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused (Rajamansingh S O Nandlalsingh Rajput and three others) of charges under IPC Section 316(3) and 406 related to diesel theft worth ₹1,800 from a tanker on 31/03/2025. The court found the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the complainant's own witness testimony and cross-examination revealed insufficient evidence of conspiracy to commit the alleged breach of trust and theft. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts