JASVANT KALIDAS PATEL vs BABUBHAI KALIDAS PATEL Advocate - A K DABHI — 73/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 31. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH030017882023
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
73/2023
Filing Date
10-08-2023
Registration No
73/2023
Registration Date
10-08-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, MEHMEDABAD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JASVANT KALIDAS PATEL
Adv. Y P JOSHI
Respondent(s)
BABUBHAI KALIDAS PATEL Advocate - A K DABHI
PRAKASHKUMAR PARSOTTAMBHAI PATEL
HARSHADBHAI CHOTABHAI PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 12-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 29-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 18-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 14-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
CASE SUMMARY: 73/2023 Court: Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Mahemdavad, Kheda District Petitioner: Jasvant Kalidas Patel Respondents: Babubhai Kalidas Patel (Advocate A.K. Dabhi), Prakashkumar Parsottambhai Patel, Harshadbhai Chotabhai Patel Outcome: Petition DISMISSED. The court rejected the petitioner's plea seeking to prevent the respondents from dealing with jointly-inherited agricultural land in Sarsavni village. The court found that a valid family partition and sale deed dated 16/07/2022 existed, and that the petitioner had not established sufficient grounds for injunction despite claiming breach of trust and unauthorized land sales. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: 73/2023 Court: Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Mahemdavad, Kheda District Petitioner: Jasvant Kalidas Patel Respondents: Babubhai Kalidas Patel (Advocate A.K. Dabhi), Prakashkumar Parsottambhai Patel, Harshadbhai Chotabhai Patel Outcome: Petition DISMISSED. The court rejected the petitioner's plea seeking to prevent the respondents from dealing with jointly-inherited agricultural land in Sarsavni village. The court found that a valid family partition and sale deed dated 16/07/2022 existed, and that the petitioner had not established sufficient grounds for injunction despite claiming breach of trust and unauthorized land sales. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts