GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT vs BHARATBHAI SHANABHAI CHAUHAN Advocate - R M KAZI — 721/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH030009702023

Filing Number

721/2023

Filing Date

27-Mar-2023

Registration No

721/2023

Registration Date

27-Mar-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, MEHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

70

Police Station

MAHEMDAVAD POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2015

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GOVERNMENT OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHARATBHAI SHANABHAI CHAUHAN Advocate - R M KAZI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: 721/2023 Court Decision: The accused, Bharatbhai Shanabhai Chauhan, was acquitted of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 338 and Motor Vehicles Act sections 177, 184. The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the CNG auto-rickshaw recklessly, as no witness could identify him as the driver at the time of the accident. The court applied the benefit of doubt in favor of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 11-May-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 07-Jan-2026

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 29-Dec-2025

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 11-Nov-2025

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 04-Oct-2025

    Judgement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 08-Sep-2025

    Final Arguments

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 11-Aug-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 19-Jul-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 25-Jun-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 11-Jun-2025

    Restored

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 11-Jun-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 11-Jun-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 11-Jun-2025

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 05-Jun-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 16-May-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 24-Apr-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  22. 24-Mar-2025

    Further Statement

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  23. 10-Mar-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  24. 25-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  25. 12-Feb-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  26. 29-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  27. 08-Jan-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  28. 10-Dec-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  29. 27-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  30. 19-Nov-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  31. 28-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  32. 14-Oct-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  33. 30-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  34. 11-Sep-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  35. 27-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  36. 07-Aug-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  37. 22-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  38. 02-Jul-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  39. 21-Jun-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  40. 27-May-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  41. 30-Apr-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  42. 28-Mar-2024

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  43. 27-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  44. 12-Feb-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  45. 10-Jan-2024

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  46. 20-Dec-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  47. 28-Nov-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  48. 30-Oct-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  49. 10-Oct-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  50. 18-Sep-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  51. 04-Sep-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  52. 09-Aug-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  53. 12-Jul-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  54. 12-Jun-2023

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  55. 05-May-2023

    Process To Accused

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  56. 27-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  57. 27-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 721/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 721/2023 Court Decision: The accused, Bharatbhai Shanabhai Chauhan, was acquitted of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 338 and Motor Vehicles Act sections 177, 184. The court found the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving the CNG auto-rickshaw recklessly, as no witness could identify him as the driver at the time of the accident. The court applied the benefit of doubt in favor of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case