KALUBHAI ABDULBHAI MALEK vs BHARATSIN SHANABHAI CHAUHAN Advocate - R H SOLANKI — 39/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 31. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH030005712022
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
39/2022
Filing Date
21-04-2022
Registration No
39/2022
Registration Date
21-04-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, MEHMEDABAD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KALUBHAI ABDULBHAI MALEK
Adv. R V TALPADA
JUBEDABIBI ABDULBHAI AKABARMIYA MALEK
Respondent(s)
BHARATSIN SHANABHAI CHAUHAN Advocate - R H SOLANKI
HITESHBHAI SHANKARBHAI PATEL
RAKEHSHBHAI SOMABHAI VAGHARI
Adv. R H SOLANKI
BIBANBIBI ABDULBHAI MALEK
YUSUFBHAI ABDULBHAI MALEK
JIBABIBI ABDULBHAI MALEK
MAHEMUDABIBI ABDULBHAI MALEK
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 12-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 29-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 18-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
| 07-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 39/2022 The petitioners, Kalubhai Abdulbhai Malek and Jubedabibi Abdulbhai Akabarmiya Malek, filed a civil suit against respondents alleging fraud in a property transaction. The petitioners' father sold a city plot (Survey No. 1047, measuring 788.67 sq.m., classified as "A") for Rs. 23,66,000 to respondents Bharatsin Shanabhai Chauhan (Advocate R.H. Solanki), Hiteshbhai Shankarbhai Patel, and Rakehshbhai Somabhai Vaghari. The respondents allegedly made false promises regarding payment, issued post-dated cheques that were dishonored, and failed to pay Rs. 13,66,000 in outstanding dues. The court allowed the petitioners' interim application and issued a prohibitory decree preventing respondents from constructing, selling, mortgaging, or encumbering the property until the remaining payment is made with interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 39/2022 The petitioners, Kalubhai Abdulbhai Malek and Jubedabibi Abdulbhai Akabarmiya Malek, filed a civil suit against respondents alleging fraud in a property transaction. The petitioners' father sold a city plot (Survey No. 1047, measuring 788.67 sq.m., classified as "A") for Rs. 23,66,000 to respondents Bharatsin Shanabhai Chauhan (Advocate R.H. Solanki), Hiteshbhai Shankarbhai Patel, and Rakehshbhai Somabhai Vaghari. The respondents allegedly made false promises regarding payment, issued post-dated cheques that were dishonored, and failed to pay Rs. 13,66,000 in outstanding dues. The court allowed the petitioners' interim application and issued a prohibitory decree preventing respondents from constructing, selling, mortgaging, or encumbering the property until the remaining payment is made with interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts