MAHAMAMDBHAI HUSENBHAI SHEKH vs AMRUTBHAI SARTANBHAI RABARI — 35/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 31,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH030005492022
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
35/2022
Filing Date
16-04-2022
Registration No
35/2022
Registration Date
16-04-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, MEHMEDABAD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAHAMAMDBHAI HUSENBHAI SHEKH
Adv. M M KAZI
Respondent(s)
AMRUTBHAI SARTANBHAI RABARI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 30-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 23-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 28-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 17-10-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's appeal challenging an order denying maintenance/relief. The court set aside the lower court's decision and directed that the property in dispute remain under the plaintiff's custody without any transfer or encumbrance until final resolution of the case. The court also imposed conditions on the defendant regarding payment of pending amounts under two sale deeds totaling approximately Rs. 10.99 lakhs, with instructions that the property cannot be transferred to third parties without satisfying the plaintiff's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's appeal challenging an order denying maintenance/relief. The court set aside the lower court's decision and directed that the property in dispute remain under the plaintiff's custody without any transfer or encumbrance until final resolution of the case. The court also imposed conditions on the defendant regarding payment of pending amounts under two sale deeds totaling approximately Rs. 10.99 lakhs, with instructions that the property cannot be transferred to third parties without satisfying the plaintiff's claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts