HEMABEN JASHUBHAI BHATT vs LAKHABHAI BAMBHA — 7/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY

CNR: GJKH030002132026

Filing Number

7/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

7/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MEHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HEMABEN JASHUBHAI BHATT

    Adv. S R DABHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LAKHABHAI BAMBHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Order

    Summary of Case 7/2026 The court dismissed Hemaben Jashubhai Bhatt's complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against Lakhabhai Bambha because the cheque (dated 05/10/2025) was presented for encashment after its validity period expired. The cheque became stale on 05/01/2026, but was presented on 16/01/2026, and the court held that Section 138 requires presentation within the validity period—stale cheques do not attract penal provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 7/2026 The court dismissed Hemaben Jashubhai Bhatt's complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against Lakhabhai Bambha because the cheque (dated 05/10/2025) was presented for encashment after its validity period expired. The cheque became stale on 05/01/2026, but was presented on 16/01/2026, and the court held that Section 138 requires presentation within the validity period—stale cheques do not attract penal provisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case