PARMAR KHANIBEN GOVINDBHAI vs MANEKBEN HIRABHAI PARMAR Advocate - P B VARSOLIYA — 41/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 22. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISE DECREE on 02nd May 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJKH030001612026

Filing Number

41/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

41/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, MEHMEDABAD

Judge

1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

02-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--COMPROMISE DECREE

Last updated 22-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PARMAR KHANIBEN GOVINDBHAI

    Adv. M R PATEL

  2. 2.BHARATKUMAR GOVINDBHAI

  3. 3.CHANDRAKANT GOVINDBHAI

  4. 4.ANILBHAI GOVIDNBHAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANEKBEN HIRABHAI PARMAR Advocate - P B VARSOLIYA

  2. 2.SANJAYBHAI HIRABHAI PARMAR

    Adv. P B VARSOLIYA

  3. 3.ANANDBHAI HIRABHAI PARMAR

    Adv. P B VARSOLIYA

  4. 4.ASHOKBHAI HIRABHAI PARMAR

    Adv. P B VARSOLIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-May-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court resolved a property dispute regarding a shared boundary wall through a settlement approved by the Lok Adalat. Both parties are permitted to construct on their respective halves of the shared wall, with each required to build a 5-inch pillar on their side and take precautions to avoid damaging the shared structure. The petitioners are restricted from building beyond 5 inches on the wall's upper portion and must notify the respondent of future construction to prevent disputes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-May-2026

    Disposed

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 04-Apr-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 41/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court resolved a property dispute regarding a shared boundary wall through a settlement approved by the Lok Adalat. Both parties are permitted to construct on their respective halves of the shared wall, with each required to build a 5-inch pillar on their side and take precautions to avoid damaging the shared structure. The petitioners are restricted from building beyond 5 inches on the wall's upper portion and must notify the respondent of future construction to prevent disputes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case