BHEMABHAI SHAKRAJI SHODA vs FATAJI KANAJI SODHA Advocate - R K JOSHI, R N PATEL, R N PATELS P SODHAPARMAR, — 1/2015
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 009. Status: FOR COUNTER AFFIDAVIT. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH030000252015
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1/2015
Filing Date
05-01-2015
Registration No
1/2015
Registration Date
05-01-2015
Court
TALUKA COURT, MEHMEDABAD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BHEMABHAI SHAKRAJI SHODA
Adv. M A PATHAN
Respondent(s)
FATAJI KANAJI SODHA Advocate - R K JOSHI, R N PATEL, R N PATELS P SODHAPARMAR,
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
FOR COUNTER AFFIDAVIT
FOR COUNTER AFFIDAVIT
FOR COUNTER AFFIDAVIT
FOR COUNTER AFFIDAVIT
FOR COUNTER AFFIDAVIT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | FOR COUNTER AFFIDAVIT | |
| 30-01-2026 | FOR COUNTER AFFIDAVIT | |
| 26-12-2025 | FOR COUNTER AFFIDAVIT | |
| 21-11-2025 | FOR COUNTER AFFIDAVIT | |
| 10-10-2025 | FOR COUNTER AFFIDAVIT |
Interim Orders
Summary The plaintiff's suit for declaration of joint ownership and relief regarding agricultural land in Mehsana district is allowed in part. The court found that the plaintiff has a 1/6 share in the disputed agricultural property as a legal heir and ordered that the defective sale deed (No. 2633/2012) be corrected and a proper partition deed be executed recognizing the plaintiff's rightful share. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to oversee the land partition and directed the parties to comply with the partition order. Costs and other consequential reliefs were granted accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The plaintiff's suit for declaration of joint ownership and relief regarding agricultural land in Mehsana district is allowed in part. The court found that the plaintiff has a 1/6 share in the disputed agricultural property as a legal heir and ordered that the defective sale deed (No. 2633/2012) be corrected and a proper partition deed be executed recognizing the plaintiff's rightful share. The court appointed a Court Commissioner to oversee the land partition and directed the parties to comply with the partition order. Costs and other consequential reliefs were granted accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts