THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs JAY MAYURBHAI THAKOR Advocate - B A PATEL — 8875/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,125(a),125(b). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 05th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH020118192025
e-Filing Number
02-09-2025
Filing Number
8875/2025
Filing Date
21-11-2025
Registration No
8875/2025
Registration Date
21-11-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT NADIAD
Judge
2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204046250589
Police Station
NADIAD TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
JAY MAYURBHAI THAKOR Advocate - B A PATEL
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 07-04-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 16-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 09-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: C.C.No.8875/2025 The State of Gujarat v. Jay Mayurbhai Thakor The court acquitted the accused Jay Mayurbhai Thakor of charges under BNS sections 281, 125(A), 125(B), and MV Act sections 177, 184 (rash/negligent driving causing injury). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly operated a rickshaw and collided with the complainant's motorcycle, injuring the complainant's brother. Despite medical evidence of fracture injury and the FIR, the complainant's oral testimony lacked supporting corroborating evidence, and witnesses could not identify the vehicle or driver, rendering the prosecution's case insufficient to meet the criminal standard of proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C.C.No.8875/2025 The State of Gujarat v. Jay Mayurbhai Thakor The court acquitted the accused Jay Mayurbhai Thakor of charges under BNS sections 281, 125(A), 125(B), and MV Act sections 177, 184 (rash/negligent driving causing injury). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused recklessly operated a rickshaw and collided with the complainant's motorcycle, injuring the complainant's brother. Despite medical evidence of fracture injury and the FIR, the complainant's oral testimony lacked supporting corroborating evidence, and witnesses could not identify the vehicle or driver, rendering the prosecution's case insufficient to meet the criminal standard of proof. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts