THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SANDIPKUMAR BELDAHIN LINAND Advocate - M R SHUKLA, R D CHAUHAN — 3398/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281,106(1). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 03rd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH020056442025
Filing Number
3398/2025
Filing Date
25-Jun-2025
Registration No
3398/2025
Registration Date
25-Jun-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT NADIAD
Judge
6-5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
03-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204045250117
Police Station
NADIAD RURAL POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANDIPKUMAR BELDAHIN LINAND Advocate - M R SHUKLA, R D CHAUHAN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Apr-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: C.C.No. 3398/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted defendant Sandipkumar Beldahin Linand of charges under BNS Sections 281, 106(1), and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184 related to a fatal road accident. The court found the prosecution failed to establish conclusive evidence that the accused's alleged rash or negligent driving directly caused the victim's death. Key Reasoning: While the complainant and witnesses testified about a collision between a tanker truck and a motorcycle near Vinapatiya on 10/03/2025 resulting in death, the court noted critical gaps: the complainant himself learned of the accident secondhand via phone call, no eyewitness directly observed the accident, and contradictions in witness accounts regarding whether they witnessed the collision or only its aftermath. The court applied the criminal jurisprudence principle that when doubt exists, benefit goes to the accused, finding the prosecution's case failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Apr-2026
Disposed
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
20-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
27-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
19-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
16-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
01-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
20-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
26-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
01-Sep-2025
Process To Accused
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
04-Aug-2025
Process To Accused
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
09-Jul-2025
Process To Accused
5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.
-
27-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3398/2025
Case Summary: C.C.No. 3398/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted defendant Sandipkumar Beldahin Linand of charges under BNS Sections 281, 106(1), and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184 related to a fatal road accident. The court found the prosecution failed to establish conclusive evidence that the accused's alleged rash or negligent driving directly caused the victim's death. Key Reasoning: While the complainant and witnesses testified about a collision between a tanker truck and a motorcycle near Vinapatiya on 10/03/2025 resulting in death, the court noted critical gaps: the complainant himself learned of the accident secondhand via phone call, no eyewitness directly observed the accident, and contradictions in witness accounts regarding whether they witnessed the collision or only its aftermath. The court applied the criminal jurisprudence principle that when doubt exists, benefit goes to the accused, finding the prosecution's case failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts