THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs SHAHBAZ AHEMAD URFE SHEBU SHAKIL AHEMAD HABIBRAHEMAN SHEKH Advocate - S G SAIYAD — 2706/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 318(4),61. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH020048632025
e-Filing Number
23-05-2025
Filing Number
2706/2025
Filing Date
09-Jun-2025
Registration No
2706/2025
Registration Date
09-Jun-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT NADIAD
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
01-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204046250324
Police Station
NADIAD TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHAHBAZ AHEMAD URFE SHEBU SHAKIL AHEMAD HABIBRAHEMAN SHEKH Advocate - S G SAIYAD
-
2.SAHIBAZ MIYA ALIAS BACHCHAN MEHBOOBMIYA SIKANDERMIYA MALEK
Adv. S G SAIYAD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
01-Apr-2026
Judegement
Case Summary: C.C.No.2706/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused (Shahbaz Ahmad and Sahibaz Miya) of charges under IPC Sections 318(4) and 61 (cheating/fraud). The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt that the accused fraudulently sold the complainant's vehicle worth ₹2,50,000 without payment. Key Reasoning: The complainant's oral testimony lacked corroborating documentary evidence of the alleged vehicle sale transaction. The court found no written agreement between parties and insufficient evidence to establish premeditated conspiracy. Applying criminal jurisprudence principles, the burden of proof remained on the prosecution throughout, which could not be discharged. Both accused were acquitted and granted bail under CrPC Section 481. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
25-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
23-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Warrant Of Arrest
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
03-Feb-2026
Warrant Of Arrest
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
07-Jan-2026
Warrant Of Arrest
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
08-Dec-2025
Warrant Of Arrest
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
18-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
04-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
12-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
08-Sep-2025
Plea
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
21-Jul-2025
Plea
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
13-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2706/2025
Case Summary: C.C.No.2706/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted both accused (Shahbaz Ahmad and Sahibaz Miya) of charges under IPC Sections 318(4) and 61 (cheating/fraud). The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt that the accused fraudulently sold the complainant's vehicle worth ₹2,50,000 without payment. Key Reasoning: The complainant's oral testimony lacked corroborating documentary evidence of the alleged vehicle sale transaction. The court found no written agreement between parties and insufficient evidence to establish premeditated conspiracy. Applying criminal jurisprudence principles, the burden of proof remained on the prosecution throughout, which could not be discharged. Both accused were acquitted and granted bail under CrPC Section 481. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts