SAPNABEN RAJENDRABHAI PANJABI vs AASHISH VIVEKANAND WAGHVANI Advocate - K C PATEL — 148/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act, 1963 Section 34. Status: Plaintiff Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJKH020044432023
Filing Number
148/2023
Filing Date
03-Aug-2023
Registration No
148/2023
Registration Date
03-Aug-2023
Court
CIVIL COURT NADIAD
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAPNABEN RAJENDRABHAI PANJABI
Adv. J G BRAHMBHATT
Respondent(s)
-
1.AASHISH VIVEKANAND WAGHVANI Advocate - K C PATEL
-
2.ROSHNIBEN VIVEKANAND WAGHVANI
Adv. K C PATEL
-
3.ANJALIBEN MURLIDHARBHAI ISHRANI
Adv. K C PATEL
-
4.RAHULBHAI MURLIDHARBHAI ISHRANI
Adv. K C PATEL
Case History
-
18-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Mar-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
26-Feb-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
01-Jan-2026
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Nov-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Oct-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Sep-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Aug-2025
Plaintiff Evidence
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Jun-2025
For R&P
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
27-Mar-2025
For R&P
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Jan-2025
For R&P
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Nov-2024
For R&P
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
13-Sep-2024
For R&P
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Aug-2024
For R&P
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
09-Jul-2024
For R&P
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
10-Jun-2024
For R&P
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
18-Apr-2024
For R&P
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
14-Mar-2024
For R&P
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
15-Feb-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
25-Jan-2024
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
14-Dec-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
28-Nov-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
03-Nov-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
27-Oct-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
21-Sep-2023
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: RCS 148/2023 Outcome: The interim injunction application was rejected. No order as to costs. Key Facts: Petitioner Sapnaben Rajendrabhai Panjabi sought a temporary injunction to prevent respondents from blocking a basement passageway/door on the south wall of her shop property in Nadiad. She claimed the passage was part of the original property purchased from the defendants and should remain accessible. Court's Reasoning: The court found the petitioner failed to satisfy the three requirements for granting interim injunction: (1) no prima facie case existed since alternative pathways to the basement were available; (2) balance of convenience was not in petitioner's favor given alternative access; and (3) no irreparable loss would result since the basement remained accessible via other routes. The court concluded the disputed passageway could not be deemed a necessity, and the petitioner's admission of alternative access undermined her claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Sep-2023
Plaintiff Evidence
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
18-Sep-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
11-Sep-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
24-Aug-2023
Hearing On Injunction Application
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
18-Aug-2023
Reply
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
17-Aug-2023
Reply
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
14-Aug-2023
Reply
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
09-Aug-2023
Reply
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
08-Aug-2023
Reply
3Rd Addl CIVIL Judge & JMFC
-
03-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 148/2023
Case Summary: RCS 148/2023 Outcome: The interim injunction application was rejected. No order as to costs. Key Facts: Petitioner Sapnaben Rajendrabhai Panjabi sought a temporary injunction to prevent respondents from blocking a basement passageway/door on the south wall of her shop property in Nadiad. She claimed the passage was part of the original property purchased from the defendants and should remain accessible. Court's Reasoning: The court found the petitioner failed to satisfy the three requirements for granting interim injunction: (1) no prima facie case existed since alternative pathways to the basement were available; (2) balance of convenience was not in petitioner's favor given alternative access; and (3) no irreparable loss would result since the basement remained accessible via other routes. The court concluded the disputed passageway could not be deemed a necessity, and the petitioner's admission of alternative access undermined her claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts