THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs BHARATBHAI PARSHOTAMBHAI PATEL Advocate - H J AHIMAKAR — 2514/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 308(2),352,351(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH020043942025

e-Filing Number

23-04-2025

Filing Number

2514/2025

Filing Date

12-May-2025

Registration No

2514/2025

Registration Date

12-May-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT NADIAD

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204046250004

Police Station

NADIAD TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 308(2),352,351(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHARATBHAI PARSHOTAMBHAI PATEL Advocate - H J AHIMAKAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Bharatbhai Parshotambhai Patel (C.C.No. 2514/2025) The court acquitted the accused Bharatbhai Parshotambhai Patel of charges under IPC sections 308(2), 352, and 351(2) (criminal intimidation and extortion). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had threatened and extorted ₹200 from the complainant (an auto-rickshaw driver) on 31/12/2024. While the complainant testified, the prosecution's oral and documentary evidence could not conclusively establish the alleged threats and forced payment. Applying the principle that the burden of proof rests on the prosecution and cannot shift to the accused, the court found insufficient evidence and acquitted the accused accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  8. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  9. 08-Dec-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  10. 04-Nov-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  11. 13-Oct-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  12. 22-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  13. 26-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  14. 04-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  15. 24-Jun-2025

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  16. 15-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  17. 12-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2514/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Gujarat v. Bharatbhai Parshotambhai Patel (C.C.No. 2514/2025) The court acquitted the accused Bharatbhai Parshotambhai Patel of charges under IPC sections 308(2), 352, and 351(2) (criminal intimidation and extortion). The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused had threatened and extorted ₹200 from the complainant (an auto-rickshaw driver) on 31/12/2024. While the complainant testified, the prosecution's oral and documentary evidence could not conclusively establish the alleged threats and forced payment. Applying the principle that the burden of proof rests on the prosecution and cannot shift to the accused, the court found insufficient evidence and acquitted the accused accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case