KHEDA JILLA MADHYASTH SAHAKARI BANK LTD. vs RAMESHBHAI DHULABHAI PATEL Advocate - D M SHAH — 2482/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH020042712025

Filing Number

2482/2025

Filing Date

05-May-2025

Registration No

2482/2025

Registration Date

05-May-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT NADIAD

Judge

6-5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KHEDA JILLA MADHYASTH SAHAKARI BANK LTD.

    Adv. K C PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESHBHAI DHULABHAI PATEL Advocate - D M SHAH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: C.C.NO.-2482 OF 2025 Court: 5th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate & Additional Civil Judge, Nadiad Petitioner: Kheda Jilla Madhyasth Sahakari Bank Ltd. Respondent: Rameshbhai Dhulabhai Patel Charge: Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, Section 138 Decision: The court found the accused guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 for issuing a cheque (Check No. 013060, dated 24.01.2025 for Rs. 1,65,993) that bounced due to insufficient funds. The accused failed to rebut the statutory presumptions or provide credible defense despite ample opportunity. Sentence: 3 months imprisonment and compensation of Rs. 1,65,993 to be paid within one month, with an additional 15 days imprisonment if payment defaults. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 28-May-2026

    Judgement

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 18-May-2026

    Judgement

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 05-May-2026

    Judgement

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 21-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 01-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  10. 28-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  11. 18-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  12. 02-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  13. 17-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  14. 30-Dec-2025

    Final Arguments

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  15. 17-Dec-2025

    Further Statement

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  16. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  17. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  18. 07-Oct-2025

    Process To Accused

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  19. 17-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  20. 02-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  21. 04-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 05-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2482/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C.NO.-2482 OF 2025 Court: 5th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate & Additional Civil Judge, Nadiad Petitioner: Kheda Jilla Madhyasth Sahakari Bank Ltd. Respondent: Rameshbhai Dhulabhai Patel Charge: Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, Section 138 Decision: The court found the accused guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 for issuing a cheque (Check No. 013060, dated 24.01.2025 for Rs. 1,65,993) that bounced due to insufficient funds. The accused failed to rebut the statutory presumptions or provide credible defense despite ample opportunity. Sentence: 3 months imprisonment and compensation of Rs. 1,65,993 to be paid within one month, with an additional 15 days imprisonment if payment defaults. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case