JASVANTSINH CHANDUBHAI CHAUHAN GUARDIAN OF DEVENDRASINH JASVANTSINH CHANDUBHAI CHAUHAN vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT — 183/2026
Case under Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 Section 12. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMI MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJKH020020872026
Filing Number
183/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
183/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT NADIAD
Judge
9-Presiding Officer, Juvenile Justice Board
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204017260084
Police Station
CHAKLASHI POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JASVANTSINH CHANDUBHAI CHAUHAN GUARDIAN OF DEVENDRASINH JASVANTSINH CHANDUBHAI CHAUHAN
Adv. J S MALEK
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Juvenile Justice Board in Nadiad, Gujarat, partially granted bail to a juvenile in Case 183/2026 on March 13, 2026. The juvenile, a Class 12 Commerce student, was granted bail on the guardian's bond of ₹15,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions including regular court appearance and ensuring no further criminal involvement. The court found the student's first offense, young age, ongoing board examinations, and clean record as mitigating factors supporting bail, while noting the applicant's primary motive appeared to be exam attendance rather than genuine bail necessity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Presiding Officer, Juvenile Justice Board
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 183/2026
The Juvenile Justice Board in Nadiad, Gujarat, partially granted bail to a juvenile in Case 183/2026 on March 13, 2026. The juvenile, a Class 12 Commerce student, was granted bail on the guardian's bond of ₹15,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions including regular court appearance and ensuring no further criminal involvement. The court found the student's first offense, young age, ongoing board examinations, and clean record as mitigating factors supporting bail, while noting the applicant's primary motive appeared to be exam attendance rather than genuine bail necessity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts