THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ZAKIRHUSEN AJIJULASAN SIKANDAR DIWAN — 1787/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH020020832026

e-Filing Number

11-03-2026

Filing Number

1787/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1787/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT NADIAD

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204046260038

Police Station

NADIAD TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12A

Petitioner(s)

1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.ZAKIRHUSEN AJIJULASAN SIKANDAR DIWAN

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Nadiad convicted the accused Zakirhusen Ajijulasan Sikandar Diwan under Section 12(a) of the Gambling Act after he pleaded guilty to gambling charges. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 and imprisonment until the rising of the court, with an additional one-day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, and ordered forfeiture of seized gambling equipment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
12-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
11-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 1787/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Nadiad convicted the accused Zakirhusen Ajijulasan Sikandar Diwan under Section 12(a) of the Gambling Act after he pleaded guilty to gambling charges. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 and imprisonment until the rising of the court, with an additional one-day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, and ordered forfeiture of seized gambling equipment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.