THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DHARMESHBHAI NARESHBHAI PARMAR — 1782/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR WANT PROSECUTION on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH020020782026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

1782/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1782/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT NADIAD

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR WANT PROSECUTION

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204046260006

Police Station

NADIAD TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DHARMESHBHAI NARESHBHAI PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Gujarat High Court quashed a police chargesheet against Dharmeshbhai Nareshbhai Parmar, finding that the court lacked jurisdiction to take cognizance because no written complaint was filed by the Police Commissioner or superior officer as mandated by CrPC Section 195. The court held that provisions of Section 195 are mandatory, and without proper complaint in writing from the required authority, the proceedings were void ab initio, thereby granting the accused relief from further prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1782/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gujarat High Court quashed a police chargesheet against Dharmeshbhai Nareshbhai Parmar, finding that the court lacked jurisdiction to take cognizance because no written complaint was filed by the Police Commissioner or superior officer as mandated by CrPC Section 195. The court held that provisions of Section 195 are mandatory, and without proper complaint in writing from the required authority, the proceedings were void ab initio, thereby granting the accused relief from further prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case