THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs DHARMESHBHAI NARESHBHAI PARMAR — 1779/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH020020752026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

1779/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

1779/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT NADIAD

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204046260048

Police Station

NADIAD TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DHARMESHBHAI NARESHBHAI PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: The State of Gujarat v. Dharmeshbhai Nareshbhai Parmar (1779/2026) The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nadiad convicted the accused Dharmeshbhai Nareshbhai Parmar under G.P. Act Section 135(1) after he admitted guilt both before the court and in lok adalat (community court). Considering the offense's severity and sentencing appropriateness, the court imposed a fine of Rs. 100 with a one-day simple imprisonment in default, deeming this proportionate punishment justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1779/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The State of Gujarat v. Dharmeshbhai Nareshbhai Parmar (1779/2026) The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nadiad convicted the accused Dharmeshbhai Nareshbhai Parmar under G.P. Act Section 135(1) after he admitted guilt both before the court and in lok adalat (community court). Considering the offense's severity and sentencing appropriateness, the court imposed a fine of Rs. 100 with a one-day simple imprisonment in default, deeming this proportionate punishment justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case