THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs VANRAJSINH DOLATSINH MAHIDA Advocate - P H GILETWALA — 1273/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th May 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJKH020016642023
Filing Number
1273/2023
Filing Date
29-Mar-2023
Registration No
1273/2023
Registration Date
29-Mar-2023
Court
CIVIL COURT NADIAD
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
30-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11204046220654
Police Station
NADIAD TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.VANRAJSINH DOLATSINH MAHIDA Advocate - P H GILETWALA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: CC.1273/2023 THE STATE OF GUJARAT v. VANRAJSINH DOLATSINH MAHIDA The Gujarat Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused, Vanrajsinh Dolatsinh Mahida, of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A (rash/negligent driving causing injury). The court found that while the prosecution alleged the accused drove recklessly at high speed, causing a vehicle accident that injured multiple persons, the prosecution failed to establish this charge beyond reasonable doubt. The court reasoned that "high speed" alone does not prove negligence or rashness without corroborating evidence, and the prosecution bore the burden of proving guilt conclusively, which it did not discharge. Consequently, the accused was acquitted under CrPC section 255(1) with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-May-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
28-May-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
13-May-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
27-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
13-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
03-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
19-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
10-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
14-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
14-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
16-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
23-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
23-Jun-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
19-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
15-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
04-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
29-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
31-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
27-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
16-Oct-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
24-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
13-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
16-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
20-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
14-May-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
09-Apr-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
12-Mar-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
06-Feb-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
02-Jan-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
05-Dec-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
02-Nov-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
10-Oct-2023
Evidence Of Prosecution
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
22-Aug-2023
Plea
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
12-Jul-2023
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
03-Jun-2023
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
29-Apr-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 1273/2023
Case Summary: CC.1273/2023 THE STATE OF GUJARAT v. VANRAJSINH DOLATSINH MAHIDA The Gujarat Chief Judicial Magistrate acquitted the accused, Vanrajsinh Dolatsinh Mahida, of charges under IPC sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A (rash/negligent driving causing injury). The court found that while the prosecution alleged the accused drove recklessly at high speed, causing a vehicle accident that injured multiple persons, the prosecution failed to establish this charge beyond reasonable doubt. The court reasoned that "high speed" alone does not prove negligence or rashness without corroborating evidence, and the prosecution bore the burden of proving guilt conclusively, which it did not discharge. Consequently, the accused was acquitted under CrPC section 255(1) with benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts