YUVRAJSINH ARVINDSINH RAJ vs DIGVIJAYSINH VINUBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - A S PARMAR — 1006/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH020013932024

Filing Number

1006/2024

Filing Date

04-Mar-2024

Registration No

1006/2024

Registration Date

04-Mar-2024

Court

CIVIL COURT NADIAD

Judge

6-5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YUVRAJSINH ARVINDSINH RAJ

    Adv. V R GOHEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DIGVIJAYSINH VINUBHAI VAGHELA Advocate - A S PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Judegement

    The court convicted accused Digvijaysinh Vinubhai Vaghela under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque for Rs. 94,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The complainant proved all statutory requirements: the cheque was presented within validity period, a legal demand notice was served within 30 days of dishonor, and the accused failed to pay within 15 days. The accused raised no probable defense despite multiple opportunities to appear and present evidence, leaving the statutory presumption of liability unrebutted. Sentence: Three months simple imprisonment and compensation of Rs. 94,000 to complainant within 45 days; additional three months imprisonment in default of payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Further Statement

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  8. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  9. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  10. 09-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  11. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  12. 29-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  13. 01-Sep-2025

    Process To Accused

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  14. 07-Aug-2025

    Process To Accused

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  15. 18-Jul-2025

    Process To Accused

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  16. 15-May-2025

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  17. 24-Mar-2025

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  18. 11-Feb-2025

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  19. 03-Jan-2025

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  20. 20-Nov-2024

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  21. 11-Oct-2024

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  22. 02-Sep-2024

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  23. 24-Jul-2024

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  24. 18-Jun-2024

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  25. 01-May-2024

    Process To Accused

    2nd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  26. 02-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 04-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1006/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted accused Digvijaysinh Vinubhai Vaghela under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque for Rs. 94,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds. The complainant proved all statutory requirements: the cheque was presented within validity period, a legal demand notice was served within 30 days of dishonor, and the accused failed to pay within 15 days. The accused raised no probable defense despite multiple opportunities to appear and present evidence, leaving the statutory presumption of liability unrebutted. Sentence: Three months simple imprisonment and compensation of Rs. 94,000 to complainant within 45 days; additional three months imprisonment in default of payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case