THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs ANILKUMAR IGNASHBHAI PARAMAR Advocate - R D CHAUHAN — 890/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 184,177. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 18th May 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH020011282026

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

890/2026

Filing Date

27-Feb-2026

Registration No

890/2026

Registration Date

27-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT NADIAD

Judge

6-5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

18-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204045250532

Police Station

NADIAD RURAL POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 184,177
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 125(a),125(b),281

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANILKUMAR IGNASHBHAI PARAMAR Advocate - R D CHAUHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-May-2026

    Judegement

    The court acquitted Anilkumar Ignashbhai Paramar of charges under BNS sections 281, 125(A), 125(B), and MV Act sections 177, 184 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant recklessly or negligently caused the accident; the victim and witnesses merely confirmed an accident occurred but could not establish the defendant's culpable conduct as the cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-May-2026

    Disposed

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 16-Apr-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    5th Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 27-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 890/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted Anilkumar Ignashbhai Paramar of charges under BNS sections 281, 125(A), 125(B), and MV Act sections 177, 184 due to insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant recklessly or negligently caused the accident; the victim and witnesses merely confirmed an accident occurred but could not establish the defendant's culpable conduct as the cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case