THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs IMRANBHAI ISMAILBHAI MALEK — 837/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR WANT PROSECUTION on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJKH020010702026

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

837/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

837/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT NADIAD

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED FOR WANT PROSECUTION

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11204046251005

Police Station

NADIAD TOWN POLICE STATION - KHEDA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.IMRANBHAI ISMAILBHAI MALEK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The Gujarat High Court held that under IPC Section 223, a police chargesheet cannot be filed without prior written authorization from the Police Commissioner or a superior officer as mandated by CrPC Section 195. The court quashed the cognizance taken by the Magistrate, finding it void ab initio, and remitted the matter for the Public Prosecutor to file a fresh complaint with proper authorization in compliance with statutory requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 837/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Gujarat High Court held that under IPC Section 223, a police chargesheet cannot be filed without prior written authorization from the Police Commissioner or a superior officer as mandated by CrPC Section 195. The court quashed the cognizance taken by the Magistrate, finding it void ab initio, and remitted the matter for the Public Prosecutor to file a fresh complaint with proper authorization in compliance with statutory requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case