IDFC FIRST BANK LTD vs VISHNUBHAI PARMAR — 108/2026

Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 18th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMI MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJKH020007532026

Filing Number

108/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

108/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT NADIAD

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

18-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.IDFC FIRST BANK LTD

    Adv. S K BHATT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VISHNUBHAI PARMAR

  2. 2.MANGUBEN VISHNUBHAI PARMAR

  3. 3.SHANKARBHAI BABUBHAI PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court granted IDFC First Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, allowing it to take possession of residential properties in Nadiad after the borrowers defaulted on their loan obligations and failed to respond to the demand notice issued under Section 13(2). The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take physical possession of the specified properties with the assistance of police if necessary, and directed the bank to deposit ₹15,000 as remuneration within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 108/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted IDFC First Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, allowing it to take possession of residential properties in Nadiad after the borrowers defaulted on their loan obligations and failed to respond to the demand notice issued under Section 13(2). The court appointed a Court Commissioner to take physical possession of the specified properties with the assistance of police if necessary, and directed the bank to deposit ₹15,000 as remuneration within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case