IDFC FIRST BANK LTD vs BHARATSINH AMARSINH SOLANKI — 107/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 Section 14,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 18th April 2026.
CRMA J - CRIMI MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC
CNR: GJKH020007522026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
107/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
107/2026
Registration Date
17-02-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT NADIAD
Judge
2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE
Decision Date
18th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
IDFC FIRST BANK LTD
Adv. S K BHATT
Respondent(s)
BHARATSINH AMARSINH SOLANKI
SHITALBEN SOLANKI
AMBALAL JENAJI SOLANKI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE
Disposed
PROCESS TO OPPONENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO OPPONENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed IDFC First Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, to take possession of an immovable property (Milkat No. 941 in Apruji village, Kheda district) that was pledged as security for a loan on which the borrower defaulted. The court appointed a Commissioner to take physical possession of the property after the bank issued a statutory demand notice and symbolic possession was already taken, finding that all procedural requirements under the Act were satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Chief Judicial Magistrate allowed IDFC First Bank's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, to take possession of an immovable property (Milkat No. 941 in Apruji village, Kheda district) that was pledged as security for a loan on which the borrower defaulted. The court appointed a Commissioner to take physical possession of the property after the bank issued a statutory demand notice and symbolic possession was already taken, finding that all procedural requirements under the Act were satisfied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts