DILIPSINH JAGATSINH CHAVDA vs STATE OF GUJARAT — 2752/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 141. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 06th May 2026.
MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION
CNR: GJKH010083202025
Filing Number
2752/2025
Filing Date
18-Dec-2025
Registration No
2752/2025
Registration Date
18-Dec-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DILIPSINH JAGATSINH CHAVDA
Adv. M R SHUKLA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF GUJARAT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Judegement
The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Nadiad allowed Dilipsinh Jagatsinh Chavda's application to sue as an indigent person under Order 33, Rules 1-2 of the Civil Procedure Code. The court found the State of Gujarat's denial lacked supporting evidence and permitted the applicant to file a motor accident compensation claim in forma pauperis, with court fees to be recovered post-adjudication as the first charge on the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
28-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
13-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
07-Feb-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
31-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
17-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
08-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2752/2025
The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) at Nadiad allowed Dilipsinh Jagatsinh Chavda's application to sue as an indigent person under Order 33, Rules 1-2 of the Civil Procedure Code. The court found the State of Gujarat's denial lacked supporting evidence and permitted the applicant to file a motor accident compensation claim in forma pauperis, with court fees to be recovered post-adjudication as the first charge on the decree. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts