RAMESHBHAI RAIJIBHAI PARMAR vs SHRI RAM TRANSPORT FINANCE - AZAZ ABDULKADAR KURESHI Advocate - M N PARMAR — 621/2025
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 374(3). Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 29th May 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJKH010081222025
Filing Number
621/2025
Filing Date
10-Dec-2025
Registration No
621/2025
Registration Date
10-Dec-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
29-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMESHBHAI RAIJIBHAI PARMAR
Adv. B T MAKWANA
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHRI RAM TRANSPORT FINANCE - AZAZ ABDULKADAR KURESHI Advocate - M N PARMAR
-
2.STATE OF GUJARAT
Adv. D R BAROT
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-May-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary: Rameshbhai Raijibhai Parmar v. Shri Ram Transport Finance (Cri. Appeal 621/2025) The Principal District Judge at Nadiad upheld the conviction of Rameshbhai Parmar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of Rs. 2,30,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds on a vehicle loan debt. However, the court substantially reduced the sentence from 6 months imprisonment to time till rising of court plus Rs. 2,000 fine (3 days SI in default), considering that the appellant had since paid the full amount to the complainant and surrendered before court, applying principles of leniency in changed circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-May-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
16-May-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
29-Apr-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
22-Jan-2026
Hearing
Principal District Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 621/2025
Case Summary: Rameshbhai Raijibhai Parmar v. Shri Ram Transport Finance (Cri. Appeal 621/2025) The Principal District Judge at Nadiad upheld the conviction of Rameshbhai Parmar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque of Rs. 2,30,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds on a vehicle loan debt. However, the court substantially reduced the sentence from 6 months imprisonment to time till rising of court plus Rs. 2,000 fine (3 days SI in default), considering that the appellant had since paid the full amount to the complainant and surrendered before court, applying principles of leniency in changed circumstances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts