JETENDRABHAI JAGDISHBHAI ROHIT vs RITESH DINESHBHAI GOHIL — 1200/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJKH010080632025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1200/2025

Filing Date

09-12-2025

Registration No

1200/2025

Registration Date

09-12-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 166,

Petitioner(s)

JETENDRABHAI JAGDISHBHAI ROHIT

Adv. B M ROHIT

Respondent(s)

RITESH DINESHBHAI GOHIL

GO DIGIT GENERAL ISURANCE Ltd

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

21-01-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

09-12-2025

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary: The Lok Adalat (M.A.C.T., Nadiad) approved a compromise settlement in a motor accident compensation case where the applicant and insurance company agreed to settle their dispute. The applicant is entitled to recover Rs. 2,40,000/- (including Rs. 20,000/- for medical bills) from the respondents jointly and severally, which the insurance company must deposit in the designated District Bank account per Supreme Court guidelines, with the petition disposed as compromised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Lok Adalat (M.A.C.T., Nadiad) approved a compromise settlement in a motor accident compensation case where the applicant and insurance company agreed to settle their dispute. The applicant is entitled to recover Rs. 2,40,000/- (including Rs. 20,000/- for medical bills) from the respondents jointly and severally, which the insurance company must deposit in the designated District Bank account per Supreme Court guidelines, with the petition disposed as compromised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case