HEIRS OF LATE BALVANTBHAI MOHANBHAI BHOI(Legal Heir) vs RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. — 2646/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 141. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.
MACMA - MAC MISC. APPLICATION
CNR: GJKH010079412025
Filing Number
2646/2025
Filing Date
04-Dec-2025
Registration No
2646/2025
Registration Date
04-Dec-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
5-4th Addl District Judge
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.HEIRS OF LATE BALVANTBHAI MOHANBHAI BHOI(Legal Heir)
Adv. R K SOLANKI1.
-
2.NAYNABEN WIDOW OF BALVANTBHAI BHOI
Adv. R K SOLANKI1.
-
3.SONALBEN DAUGHTER OF BALVANTBHAI BHOI
Adv. R K SOLANKI1.
-
4.NAYNABEN BALVANTBHAI BHOI GUARDIAN OF MINOR JIGNESHKUMAR BALVANTBHAI BHOI
Adv. R K SOLANKI
Respondent(s)
-
1.RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) ordered Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. to deposit ₹18,927.00 in court, with ₹18,217.00 payable to claimant Naynaben Balvantbhai Bhoi after deducting court fees and medical bills. The tribunal directed the concerned bank to retain the fixed deposit with the court's Nazir, permit only periodic interest payments until maturity, and prohibit any loans or advances against the deposit without prior tribunal permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
4th Addl District Judge
-
12-Feb-2026
Hearing
4th Addl District Judge
-
15-Jan-2026
Hearing
4th Addl District Judge
-
01-Jan-2026
Hearing
4th Addl District Judge
-
11-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2646/2025
The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT) ordered Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. to deposit ₹18,927.00 in court, with ₹18,217.00 payable to claimant Naynaben Balvantbhai Bhoi after deducting court fees and medical bills. The tribunal directed the concerned bank to retain the fixed deposit with the court's Nazir, permit only periodic interest payments until maturity, and prohibit any loans or advances against the deposit without prior tribunal permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts