HARISHBHAI ARVINDBHAI HARIJAN(VAGHELA) vs AMJATHUSEN ALIAS ANNA AKTAR HUSEN — 1177/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJKH010079352025

Filing Number

1177/2025

Filing Date

04-Dec-2025

Registration No

1177/2025

Registration Date

04-Dec-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HARISHBHAI ARVINDBHAI HARIJAN(VAGHELA)

    Adv. M R SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMJATHUSEN ALIAS ANNA AKTAR HUSEN

  2. 2.JAVIDBHAI SALIMBHAI MEMAN

  3. 3.SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD

    Adv. R G DAVE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Lok Adalat (M.A.C.T.) at Nadiad disposed of the motor accident compensation petition by approving a compromise settlement between the applicant and insurance company. The court awarded Rs. 8,75,000 (including Rs. 4,45,000 for medical bills) to be deposited in a designated district bank account, with disbursement to follow after deposit confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal District Judge

  7. 04-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 04-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1177/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Lok Adalat (M.A.C.T.) at Nadiad disposed of the motor accident compensation petition by approving a compromise settlement between the applicant and insurance company. The court awarded Rs. 8,75,000 (including Rs. 4,45,000 for medical bills) to be deposited in a designated district bank account, with disbursement to follow after deposit confirmation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case