GULNAZBANU SOHELHUSEN MALEK-DAUGHTER OF BISMILLAHKHAN PATHAN vs SHARMA AKSHAYKUMAR ARVINDBHAI — 1174/2025
Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.
MACP - MAC PETITION
CNR: GJKH010078902025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1174/2025
Filing Date
03-12-2025
Registration No
1174/2025
Registration Date
03-12-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GULNAZBANU SOHELHUSEN MALEK-DAUGHTER OF BISMILLAHKHAN PATHAN
Adv. M R SHUKLA
Respondent(s)
SHARMA AKSHAYKUMAR ARVINDBHAI
SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD
Adv. S R SHELAT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 09-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE | |
| 09-02-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE | |
| 08-01-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE | |
| 03-12-2025 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Lok Adalat approved a compromise settlement in this motor accident claim where the applicant and insurance company agreed to resolve their dispute. The court awarded Rs. 6,10,000/- (including Rs. 2,10,000/- for medical bills) to be paid jointly and severally by the respondents, with the amount to be deposited in a District Bank account as per Supreme Court guidelines. The petition was disposed of as compromised with no court fee deduction permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Lok Adalat approved a compromise settlement in this motor accident claim where the applicant and insurance company agreed to resolve their dispute. The court awarded Rs. 6,10,000/- (including Rs. 2,10,000/- for medical bills) to be paid jointly and severally by the respondents, with the amount to be deposited in a District Bank account as per Supreme Court guidelines. The petition was disposed of as compromised with no court fee deduction permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts