GULNAZBANU SOHELHUSEN MALEK-DAUGHTER OF BISMILLAHKHAN PATHAN vs SHARMA AKSHAYKUMAR ARVINDBHAI — 1174/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJKH010078902025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1174/2025

Filing Date

03-12-2025

Registration No

1174/2025

Registration Date

03-12-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 166,

Petitioner(s)

GULNAZBANU SOHELHUSEN MALEK-DAUGHTER OF BISMILLAHKHAN PATHAN

Adv. M R SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

SHARMA AKSHAYKUMAR ARVINDBHAI

SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD

Adv. S R SHELAT

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

09-02-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

08-01-2026

SUMMONS - NOTICE

03-12-2025

SUMMONS - NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary: The Lok Adalat approved a compromise settlement in this motor accident claim where the applicant and insurance company agreed to resolve their dispute. The court awarded Rs. 6,10,000/- (including Rs. 2,10,000/- for medical bills) to be paid jointly and severally by the respondents, with the amount to be deposited in a District Bank account as per Supreme Court guidelines. The petition was disposed of as compromised with no court fee deduction permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Lok Adalat approved a compromise settlement in this motor accident claim where the applicant and insurance company agreed to resolve their dispute. The court awarded Rs. 6,10,000/- (including Rs. 2,10,000/- for medical bills) to be paid jointly and severally by the respondents, with the amount to be deposited in a District Bank account as per Supreme Court guidelines. The petition was disposed of as compromised with no court fee deduction permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case