PRADIPSINH NARVATSINH CHAUHAN vs NIMESHBHAI ARJUNBHAI PARMAR — 1151/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACP - MAC PETITION

CNR: GJKH010076872025

Filing Number

1151/2025

Filing Date

26-Nov-2025

Registration No

1151/2025

Registration Date

26-Nov-2025

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD

Judge

1-Principal District Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 23-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRADIPSINH NARVATSINH CHAUHAN

    Adv. D K DARJI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NIMESHBHAI ARJUNBHAI PARMAR

  2. 2.RAMILABEN RAMANBHAI RATHOD

  3. 3.BAJAJ ALLIANZ GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

    Adv. A R PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    Case Summary The Lok Adalat (M.A.C.T.) at Nadiad approved a compromise settlement in this motor accident compensation case, awarding the applicant Rs. 11,85,000/- (including Rs. 6,97,663/- for medical bills) to be recovered jointly and severally from the respondents/insurance company. The court directed the opposing party to deposit the awarded amount in the District Bank Account via RTGS/NEFT and ordered no deduction of court fee stamp, with the petition disposed as compromised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Reply

    Principal District Judge

  5. 02-Feb-2026

    Reply

    Principal District Judge

  6. 13-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  7. 01-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal District Judge

  8. 26-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 26-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1151/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Lok Adalat (M.A.C.T.) at Nadiad approved a compromise settlement in this motor accident compensation case, awarding the applicant Rs. 11,85,000/- (including Rs. 6,97,663/- for medical bills) to be recovered jointly and severally from the respondents/insurance company. The court directed the opposing party to deposit the awarded amount in the District Bank Account via RTGS/NEFT and ordered no deduction of court fee stamp, with the petition disposed as compromised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case