KIRITSINH RAMSINH CHAUHAN vs CHIMANBHAI JENABHAI SODHAPARMAR — 65/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 43. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 27th April 2026.
MACEX - MAC EXECUTION PETITION
CNR: GJKH010070772025
Filing Number
65/2025
Filing Date
03-Nov-2025
Registration No
65/2025
Registration Date
03-Nov-2025
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT NADIAD
Judge
1-Principal District Judge
Decision Date
27-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--WITHDRAWN
Last updated 22-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KIRITSINH RAMSINH CHAUHAN
Adv. G L PARMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.CHIMANBHAI JENABHAI SODHAPARMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Apr-2026
OrderView PDF
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) in Nadiad disposed of the MAC Execution Petition No. 65/2025 filed by Kiritsinh Ramsinh Chauhan against Chimanbhai Jenabhai Sodhaparmar as withdrawn, following the applicant's advocate's withdrawal application. No costs were awarded to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District Judge
-
22-Apr-2026
Process Of Execution
Principal District Judge
-
17-Apr-2026
Process Of Execution
Principal District Judge
-
30-Mar-2026
Process Of Execution
Principal District Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Process Of Execution
Principal District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Process Of Execution
Principal District Judge
-
24-Feb-2026
Process Of Execution
Principal District Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
Process Of Execution
Principal District Judge
-
30-Jan-2026
Process Of Execution
Principal District Judge
-
12-Jan-2026
Process Of Execution
Principal District Judge
-
24-Dec-2025
Process Of Execution
Principal District Judge
-
15-Dec-2025
Process Of Execution
Principal District Judge
-
03-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 65/2025
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) in Nadiad disposed of the MAC Execution Petition No. 65/2025 filed by Kiritsinh Ramsinh Chauhan against Chimanbhai Jenabhai Sodhaparmar as withdrawn, following the applicant's advocate's withdrawal application. No costs were awarded to either party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts